Real-or-fake review method update
Updated: 2026-07-12
Update safety review structure by separating claim, evidence, and risk boundaries.
Direct update
- Use claim vs evidence sectioning for every claim
- Add unresolved questions and verification date
- Link red-flag and evidence pages in one chain
Execution flow
- Define what can be verified now
- Mark unverified points and update status
- Add source-independent next-check notes
FAQ
Can we state this is always safe?
No. Present conditions and verification scope instead.
How to separate opinion and proof?
Use distinct proof blocks and method blocks with timestamp.
Why keep evidence logs updated weekly?
Recurring claims need fresh context for trust and confidence.
Risk Notice
Claims above should not be treated as guarantees. For high-risk items, use user-provided proof and keep unsupported statements out of this page.
Related pages
Submission
After sitemap and feed updates, submit the URL to GSC and keep one week cadence.